It has to retreat once it fires it salvo and will only be able to deal some damage every time it recharged. Neither of them are as consistent or durable.Ī Katyusha can easily be killed by various threats to it. Nope they don't and there is a simple reason why. Im not trying to pull the realism argument, but having just the SU- 85+ oorah AT grenades isn't going to be enough at times, not to mention tech costs which the ISU doesnt have, just a high cost in general.Ī table a écrit :this is something the katyusha, KV2, 120mm mortar, B4203 howitzer and demo charges also excell at. I'd personally trade its AI capabilities for improved performance against armor, since a gun that size simply shouldn't be able to deflect. this is something the katyusha, KV2, 120mm mortar, B4203 howitzer and demo charges also excell at. It may not have more penetration than other Soviet AT shells, but getting in a good hit counts for a lot, which can be irritating to enemies that are too used to the regular amount of damage. While everything else has to make due with 160 damage per shot, this one brings 240. Once support has been dealt with, it can still double as AT and bring the highest damage per shot the Soviets have. You can negate this entire benefit they have over you, which allows the rest of your army to deal with the tanks more easily, because their support is constantly taking losses. Consider that Axis infantry is going to be best at long range vs generally more cqb orientated Soviet troops. You get them to one shot wipe veteran infantry at 70 range. DarTH ShodaN a écrit :You don't get ISU-152s to kill tanks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |